So Not a Surprise
A group of employees at SpaceX wrote a letter condemning Elon Musk’s Twitter antics, noting that it reflects poorly on the company, and is counter to the policies of the company, which are strictly enforced against the “Mere Mortals” who actually do the work there.
Rather unsurprisingly, they were promptly fired, in classic, “Free speech for me, but not for thee,” Elon Musk style.
Equally unsurprising is that this is almost certainly a violation of US labor laws, which makes it illegal to retaliate against workers for raising issues about conditions at the workplace.
Here’s hoping that these workers, who made a completely reasonable complaint about working conditions, hit the jackpot in court:
On Friday, SpaceX fired a group of employees involved in crafting an open letter to corporate leaders that criticized CEO Elon Musk — and labor lawyers now say the firings may have violated US labor law. The letter circulated Thursday calling for stronger anti-harassment policies at SpaceX and a more restrained Twitter presence from Musk. At least five employees were fired shortly after the letter was published.
It’s unclear whether any of the fired employees will try to file suit with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). But if they do, lawyers say they will have a strong case. “To be covered, an action has to be concerted (certainly the case here) and it has to relate to working conditions,” says Charlotte Garden, a law professor at Seattle University who wrote about employee speech rights for the Economic Policy Institute earlier this year.
The most difficult part of retaliation cases is often proving that an employee really was fired in retaliation for speaking up, but SpaceX has made it easy to show the connection. In her note to employees after the firings, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell made clear that the employees had been terminated specifically because of their involvement with the letter, which she characterized as “overreaching activism.” Even if SpaceX tried to deny it, the simple timing of the firings — coming less than 24 hours after the letter itself — makes the connection hard to ignore.
“This could very much be seen as retaliation for speaking up,” says Mary Inman, a whistleblower attorney at Constantine Cannon. “What does this say to workers? It basically says, we don’t want to hear from you.”
Given that Elon Musk’s behavior is at the center of this dispute, and given that it is likely that he had some role in the firings, I would expect an EXTREMELY thorough discovery process, emails, hours of sworn testimony from Musk, etc.
I would pay to watch the live stream of his sworn testimony. because he is going to completely lose his sh%$.