My Heart Bleeds Borscht for Them

Matthew G. Saroff
2 min readSep 1, 2023

--

In response to claims by ISPs that it is too difficult for them to list all the fees that they charge their customers, the FCC has told the ISPs to go Cheney themselves.

Nice that the FCC is not pimping for the incumbents any more

The Federal Communications Commission yesterday rejected requests to eliminate an upcoming requirement that Internet service providers list all of their monthly fees.

Five major trade groups representing US broadband providers petitioned the FCC in January to scrap the requirement before it takes effect. In June, Comcast told the FCC that the listing-every-fee rule “impose[s] significant administrative burdens and unnecessary complexity in complying with the broadband label requirements.”

………

Comcast and other ISPs objected to a requirement that ISPs “list all recurring monthly fees” including “all charges that providers impose at their discretion, i.e., charges not mandated by a government.” They complained that the rule will force them “to display the pass-through of fees imposed by federal, state, or local government agencies on the consumer broadband label.”

Hotels display these fees, why is it so tough for you?

What they really want to do is to act like Comcast, promise, break those promises, then profit.

………

As we’ve previously written, ISPs could simplify billing and comply with the new broadband-labeling rules by including all costs in their advertised rates. That would give potential customers a clearer idea of how much they have to pay each month and save ISPs the trouble of listing every charge that they currently choose to break out separately.

Rejecting the broadband industry’s request, the FCC order yesterday said:

[W]e affirm our requirement that providers display all monthly fees with respect to broadband service on the label to provide consumers with clear and accurate information about the cost of their broadband service. We thus decline providers’ request that they not disclose those fees or that they instead display an “up to” price for certain fees they choose to pass through to consumers.

Specifically, “providers must itemize the fees they add to base monthly prices, including fees related to government programs they choose to ‘pass through’ to consumers, such as fees related to universal service or regulatory fees,” the FCC said.

This sh%$ ain’t hard. The ISPs already have the f%$#ing fees on their f%$#ing computers so they can f%$#ing price gouge their customers, so they can f%$#ing provide said customers with transparency.

--

--

Matthew G. Saroff
Matthew G. Saroff

Written by Matthew G. Saroff

Husband, father, pinko, slave to cats

No responses yet